Essays and worked examples on changing unwanted habits

The Psychology of Quitting

Understand the argument that keeps bringing you back

"It's a Reward, Not a Problem": When Pleasure Becomes the Defense

The pleasure is real. The label protects it from examination.

You work hard. You give a lot. The habit is the thing you give yourself. Calling it a problem feels ungrateful, puritanical, like removing the one bright spot in a difficult day. “It’s a reward,” you say. And the word closes the conversation.

The label “reward” does something specific: it moves the habit from the category of things that can be questioned into the category of things that are deserved. Who would take away someone’s reward?

Wanting without liking

Robinson and Berridge’s incentive-sensitization theory proposes that the brain’s reward system has two separable components: wanting, the motivational pull toward a substance or behavior, and liking, the actual pleasure it produces [1]. Repeated use sensitizes the wanting system, making the urge stronger, while the liking may stay the same or even decline [2].

This means a habit can feel intensely desirable without being intensely enjoyable. You can want the cigarette urgently and then smoke it with indifference. You can crave the scroll and then put the phone down feeling emptier than before. The wanting masquerades as anticipation of pleasure, but the pleasure itself may have left long ago.

A fictional example

The following is an illustrative example, not a real person’s story.

Yuki buys himself a pastry and a large latte every morning on the way to work. He started doing it years ago as a genuine treat. The walk to the café, the smell, the first bite, all of it was pleasurable. Now it is a routine. He barely tastes the pastry. He drinks the latte out of habit. The charge on his card each month is substantial.

  • What he thinks: “This is my reward. I work hard. I deserve this one nice thing.”
  • What he feels: A brief anticipatory pleasure on the walk. Then nothing much. Then a vague dissatisfaction by noon.
  • What he does: Returns the next morning, because the morning would feel wrong without it. Not because it is right, but because it is expected.

Yuki’s latte is no longer functioning as a reward. It is functioning as a baseline. He does not enjoy it so much as he would miss it, and the two sensations feel the same from the inside but are structurally different.

Hedonic adaptation

Research on hedonic adaptation shows that the pleasure derived from repeated experiences diminishes over time. The first exposure is typically the most pleasurable; subsequent ones provide less, even as the person continues seeking them [3]. A revised model of adaptation found that people differ in how much they adapt, but the general direction is consistent: pleasure fades, and the behavior persists [4].

A model of addiction as allostatic dysregulation proposes that repeated use literally shifts the brain’s reward baseline downward, so that the substance or behavior is eventually needed just to return to normal rather than to feel good [6]. The “reward” becomes the avoidance of the low that its absence creates.

Yuki’s latte is not making his morning better than it would be without the habit. It is making his morning equal to what it would be without the habit, if the habit had never started.

The justification structure

Research on justification-based self-regulation failure found that framing a behavior as a reward is one of the most common ways people give themselves permission to indulge. The justification “I deserve this” bypasses the self-regulation system by making the indulgence feel earned and therefore exempt from scrutiny [5].

The word “reward” does this efficiently. A reward is something you have earned. Questioning it feels like punishing yourself. And who would argue against earned pleasure?

But a reward that is automatic is not a reward. It is a routine. And a routine that no longer delivers pleasure is not a reward at all. It is a habit that has kept the label after losing the contents.

Questions to examine the thought

When “it’s a reward, not a problem” arrives:

  1. Is this the first time or the hundredth? The first pastry is a reward. The hundredth is a habit. When did it cross over?
  2. How do you feel during the behavior? Not the anticipation. The actual moment. Is the pleasure proportionate to the cost?
  3. How do you feel afterwards? Satisfied, or just less uncomfortable?
  4. What would happen if you skipped it? If the answer is anxiety or irritation rather than mild disappointment, the behavior may be managing withdrawal rather than delivering reward.
  5. What else could you reward yourself with? If the list is empty, the habit may have crowded out your sense of what pleasure looks like.

Earning a real reward

The aim is not to eliminate pleasure from your life. It is to notice when the label “reward” is protecting a behavior that no longer rewards you.

If the habit still brings genuine pleasure, genuine satisfaction that you feel the next morning, that is worth knowing. If it brings only relief from its own absence, that is worth knowing too. The label should follow the experience, not substitute for it.

For the thought that uses effort to justify indulgence, see “I’ve earned a break” and when rest becomes the habit’s opening. For the related question of whether you actually deserve the thing you are claiming, see examining “I deserve this” without dismissing your needs.

When to get more support. If you notice that the habit provides less pleasure than it used to but you cannot stop, that pattern is worth discussing with a professional. The gap between wanting and liking is a feature of dependence, and a therapist or specialist service can help you understand what is driving the behavior. In the US, call or text 988 if you are in crisis. In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans are on 116 123.

Frequently asked questions

Is it wrong to enjoy my habits?

No. Pleasure is a legitimate part of life. The question becomes relevant when the label 'reward' is doing the work of shielding the habit from examination, when calling it a treat prevents you from asking whether it is still treating you well.

What is hedonic adaptation?

Hedonic adaptation is the tendency for the pleasure derived from a repeated experience to diminish over time. The first experience is the most pleasurable; subsequent ones provide less, even as the desire for them remains constant or increases.

What is the difference between wanting and liking?

In Robinson and Berridge's incentive-sensitization model, wanting is the motivational pull toward a substance or behavior, driven by dopamine. Liking is the actual pleasure experienced. Repeated use can increase wanting while leaving liking unchanged or even decreasing it. You can want something intensely without enjoying it much.

How do I know if my habit has stopped being rewarding?

Ask yourself: after the behavior, do you feel satisfied or just less uncomfortable? Do you look forward to it with genuine anticipation or with a sense of compulsion? Is the pleasure proportionate to the cost?

Sources and further reading

  1. Robinson and Berridge — The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction

    Brain Research Reviews, 1993;18(3):247–291. Foundational paper distinguishing wanting from liking. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P.

  2. Berridge, Robinson and Aldridge — Dissecting components of reward: 'liking', 'wanting', and learning

    Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 2009;9(1):65–73. Updated review of the wanting/liking distinction. DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014.

  3. Frederick and Loewenstein — Hedonic adaptation

    In Kahneman, Diener and Schwarz (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Russell Sage Foundation, 1999, pp. 302–329. Chapter on how people adapt to repeated pleasurable experiences.

  4. Diener, Lucas and Scollon — Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being

    American Psychologist, 2006;61(4):305–314. Updated model of hedonic adaptation with individual differences. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.

  5. De Witt Huberts, Evers and De Ridder — "Because I am worth it": a theoretical framework and empirical review of a justification-based account of self-regulation failure

    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2014;18(2):119–138. Framework on justification and self-regulation failure. DOI: 10.1177/1088868313507533.

  6. Koob and Le Moal — Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis

    Neuropsychopharmacology, 2001;24(2):97–129. Model of how repeated use shifts the reward baseline downward. DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00195-0.

Sources checked October 16, 2026. This is an editorial summary, not a systematic review or individual advice.

Related articles

"But I Enjoy It": When Pleasure Is the Last Argument

Why 'but I enjoy it' feels like a complete argument for keeping a habit, what research on wanting versus liking and hedonic adaptation shows, and how to check whether you still enjoy the thing or just the idea of it.