"I Was Doing Well Until…": The Trigger That Gets All the Blame
The trigger was real. The conclusion that it ruined everything is where the thinking goes wrong.
The story after a lapse is almost always the same: “I was doing really well. And then…” The trigger fills in the rest. A stressful week. A fight with a partner. An invitation to a party. A bad day at work. A sleepless night.
The trigger is usually real. The explanation is usually incomplete.
How the trigger narrative works
Marlatt and Gordon’s relapse-prevention model identified categories of high-risk situations that commonly precede a lapse: negative emotional states, interpersonal conflict, social pressure, positive emotional states (celebration), and exposure to substance-related cues [1] [2]. These are real and identifiable. Knowing what your high-risk situations are is genuinely useful.
But the model also makes a critical distinction: the trigger does not cause the lapse. The person’s coping response to the trigger determines what happens next. When someone encounters a high-risk situation and has a prepared, effective coping response, self-efficacy increases and the risk of lapse decreases. When they encounter the same situation without a coping response, the lapse becomes likely [2].
“I was doing well until the trigger” stops at the first half of this equation. It identifies the situation but does not ask: what was my plan for this situation, and why did it not work?
A fictional example
The following is an illustrative example, not a real person’s story.
Ben had not used social media for nineteen days. Then his ex posted photos from a holiday. His friend showed him. Within an hour, he had reinstalled the apps and spent three hours scrolling.
- His explanation: “I was doing great until Jamie showed me those photos. That ruined everything.”
- What he does not examine: He had no plan for encountering content about his ex. He had told Jamie he was taking a break from social media but not asked Jamie to avoid showing him things. The apps were still linked to his accounts, so reinstalling took ten seconds.
The trigger, seeing the photos, was real. It was also predictable. If Ben had prepared for it, the nineteen days might have been twenty. The trigger is not the lesson. The missing coping plan is the lesson.
The dynamic model of relapse
A more recent model of relapse, developed by Witkiewitz and Marlatt, moved away from the idea that relapse follows a linear trigger-response pathway [3]. Instead, it describes relapse as emerging from a dynamic system of risk factors: background factors (stress, mood, motivation), immediate triggers, and coping resources interact in real time. A trigger that leads to relapse on a tired, lonely Tuesday may not lead to relapse on a well-rested, socially connected Thursday.
Real-time monitoring studies support this complexity. In a study of smokers, self-efficacy fluctuated throughout the day, and drops in self-efficacy preceded lapses more reliably than any specific external trigger [5]. The state of the person mattered as much as the situation.
Building trigger plans
The goal is not to eliminate triggers, which is impossible, but to arrive at each one with a response already prepared:
- List your top five triggers. Be specific: not “stress” but “the hour after a difficult phone call with my manager.”
- For each, write a specific coping response. Implementation intentions work best in if-then form [4]: “If I feel the urge after a work call, then I will walk to the kitchen, make tea, and sit with the feeling for ten minutes.”
- Practice the response. Mentally rehearse it. The goal is for the coping response to become as automatic as the habit itself.
- After a lapse, update the plan. Do not just blame the trigger. Ask: which trigger was it? Did I have a plan for it? If yes, why did the plan fail? If no, add one.
- Track the pattern. Over several lapses, you will see which situations are genuinely difficult and which you have already learned to handle. The list should get shorter.
The useful reframe
“I was doing well until X” becomes: “I was doing well, and X showed me what my plan does not yet cover.”
The trigger is not the villain. It is the exam question. The work is to study for the next one.
For what happens after the lapse itself, see “I already failed, so why bother?”. For the thought that treats a single failure as proof that change is impossible, see “I’ve tried before and it didn’t work”.
When to get more support. If the same trigger keeps leading to lapses despite your best planning, or if the triggers are situations you cannot avoid (a difficult living situation, a chronic health condition, a workplace you cannot leave), a therapist trained in relapse prevention can help you develop more effective coping strategies. In the US, SAMHSA’s National Helpline (1-800-662-4357) offers free, confidential referral. In the UK, your GP can refer you to appropriate services. If you are in distress, call or text 988 in the US, or contact Samaritans on 116 123 in the UK and Ireland.
Frequently asked questions
Why do I always blame the trigger?
Because it is easier than questioning the plan. If the trigger caused the lapse, then you were doing well and something external knocked you off course. This explanation protects your self-image as someone who was succeeding, but it prevents you from asking what was missing from your coping strategy.
Are triggers real?
Yes. Certain situations, emotions and cues reliably increase the likelihood of a lapse. Research has identified categories including negative emotions, social pressure, interpersonal conflict and exposure to the substance or behavior. But the trigger increases risk; it does not determine outcome. The coping response determines outcome.
How do I stop triggers from causing a lapse?
You cannot eliminate all triggers. You can prepare for the predictable ones. For each high-risk situation you have identified, plan a specific coping response in advance. Research on implementation intentions shows that specific if-then plans are more effective than general resolve.
Sources and further reading
- Marlatt and Gordon — Relapse Prevention: Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment of Addictive Behaviors
Guilford Press, 1985. Foundational text identifying high-risk situations and the role of coping responses in determining relapse.
- Larimer, Palmer and Marlatt — Relapse prevention. An overview of Marlatt's cognitive-behavioral model
Alcohol Research & Health, 1999;23:151–160. Accessible overview of the model, including the taxonomy of high-risk situations.
- Witkiewitz and Marlatt — Relapse prevention for alcohol and drug problems: that was Zen, this is Tao
American Psychologist, 2004;59(4):224–235. Updated dynamic model of relapse, moving from a linear trigger-response view to a more complex system. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.224.
- Gollwitzer — Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans
American Psychologist, 1999;54(7):493–503. Review of how specific if-then plans improve goal pursuit. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493.
- Shiffman et al. — Dynamic effects of self-efficacy on smoking lapse and relapse
Health Psychology, 2000;19(4):315–323. Real-time monitoring of self-efficacy and smoking lapses, showing that self-efficacy dropped before lapses. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.4.315.
- Hendershot et al. — Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 2011;6:17. Updated review of relapse prevention theory and its evidence base. DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-17.
Sources checked October 16, 2026. This is an editorial summary, not a systematic review or individual advice.