Essays and worked examples on changing unwanted habits

The Psychology of Quitting

Understand the argument that keeps bringing you back

"I Need It to Cope": When the Habit Is the Only Tool in the Box

You may be right that you need something. You may be wrong that it has to be this.

This one does not sound like a bargain. It sounds like a fact. You are anxious, or overwhelmed, or lonely, or in pain, and the habit is the thing that makes it bearable. Taking it away would not be a lifestyle improvement. It would be removing the floor while you are standing on it.

The thought deserves more respect than most bargaining thoughts, because it is often partly right. The habit may genuinely be the most effective coping tool you currently have. But “currently” is the operative word.

The self-medication logic

The self-medication hypothesis, proposed by Khantzian, suggests that people use substances not randomly but specifically to manage emotional states they find intolerable. The substance choice is not accidental: people gravitate toward substances that address their particular form of distress [6].

A motivational model of alcohol use found that people drink to regulate both negative and positive emotions, with coping motives, drinking to reduce distress, being the strongest predictor of problematic use [4].

The framework applies beyond substances. People scroll to avoid boredom, shop to soothe anxiety, eat to manage loneliness, gamble for the adrenaline that displaces depression. In each case, the habit is doing a job.

A fictional example

The following is an illustrative example, not a real person’s story.

Dina has been eating late at night for three years, typically after her children are in bed and the house is quiet. The eating is not about hunger. It is about the overwhelming stillness after a day of managing two small children alone while her partner works evenings.

  • What she thinks: “This is the only time I have to myself. The food is the only thing that makes the evening bearable. I need this.”
  • What she feels: A complicated mix of relief, guilt and something she would call survival.
  • What she does: Eats until the feeling passes, then feels worse, then does the same thing the next night.

Dina is not being dramatic when she says she needs it. The evening is genuinely hard. The eating genuinely helps, for about thirty minutes. After that, it helps less, but by then the pattern has completed itself.

The coping repertoire problem

Research on coping distinguishes between problem-focused strategies, addressing the source of stress, and emotion-focused strategies, managing the feelings the stress produces [1]. Both are necessary. The issue is when the repertoire narrows to a single emotion-focused strategy that happens to be the habit.

A meta-analysis of emotion-regulation strategies found that avoidant strategies, including substance use and behavioral avoidance, were consistently associated with more psychopathology, while strategies like cognitive reappraisal were associated with less [2]. The pattern is not surprising: avoidant strategies work quickly but do not resolve the underlying problem, so the person needs them again, and again, and again.

Research on coping styles found that people use multiple strategies simultaneously, and that the breadth of one’s coping repertoire matters as much as any single strategy [3]. When the habit is the only tool, removing it leaves nothing. When it is one of several tools, removing it is manageable.

Why “just stop” does not work here

The advice to “just quit” makes sense only if you have somewhere else to go emotionally. If the habit is the only thing standing between you and unmanageable distress, quitting without a replacement is not discipline. It is stranding yourself.

This is why the thought feels so resistant to challenge. It is not making an excuse. It is describing a real structural problem: the absence of alternatives.

Building before removing

The more practical approach is to build the alternatives before or alongside reducing the habit:

  • Identify what the habit provides. Not the substance or behavior itself, but the emotional function: calm, stimulation, numbing, connection, escape.
  • Find two or three alternatives that provide a similar function. They do not need to be as powerful. They need to be available and real. If the habit provides calm, a ten-minute breathing exercise at the same time of day is an alternative, even a pale one.
  • Practice the alternatives while still using the habit. This is not hypocrisy. It is skill-building. You would not throw away crutches before testing the healed leg.
  • Reduce the habit gradually as the alternatives become more practiced. The habit can decline as the repertoire grows.

Questions to examine the thought

When “I need it to cope” arrives:

  1. What emotion is the habit managing? Be specific: anxiety, loneliness, boredom, anger, exhaustion.
  2. What else have you tried? List the alternatives you have used in the past, even once. If the list is empty, that is the problem.
  3. Does the habit make the underlying problem better or just the feeling? If it manages the feeling without changing the situation, the situation persists and demands the habit again tomorrow.
  4. What would happen if you delayed the habit by twenty minutes? Not skipped it. Delayed it. What would you do in those twenty minutes?
  5. If a therapist offered to help you build other ways to cope, would you want that? If yes, that is worth pursuing.

Respecting the need

The goal is not to dismiss the need for coping. It is to separate the need from the method. Dina needs relief in the evenings. That is real. The late-night eating is one method of getting it, and it comes with costs. Other methods exist, but they have not been built up because the eating was always available.

Respecting the need means taking it seriously enough to address it properly, not just with the first tool that comes to hand.

For the thought that the habit is the only source of pleasure, see “it’s the only thing that relaxes me”. For the broader question of what happens after you remove the habit, see “What will I do instead?” and the void the habit leaves behind.

When to get more support. If the habit is your primary way of managing intense emotions, building alternatives is exactly what therapy is designed to help with. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, and other structured approaches specifically teach emotion-regulation skills. You do not need to quit the habit before seeking help; a therapist can work with you while you are still using it. In the US, call or text 988 if you are in crisis. In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans are on 116 123.

Frequently asked questions

Is my habit really helping me cope, or is it making things worse?

Probably both. In the short term, the habit reliably reduces distress. In the longer term, it often prevents you from developing other coping strategies and can add new sources of stress: guilt, health effects, financial costs. The relief is real. The question is what it costs.

Can I quit a coping habit without replacing it?

You can try, but the research suggests it is harder and less likely to last. If the habit fills a genuine emotional need, removing it without an alternative often leads to either relapse or the adoption of a different unhealthy habit. Building replacements is not a sign of weakness. It is strategy.

What counts as a healthy coping strategy?

Strategies that reduce distress without creating new problems. Examples include physical activity, social connection, creative expression, structured relaxation and, when the distress is persistent, professional support. The best strategy is one you will actually use.

What if I can't imagine coping without it?

That is important information. It suggests the habit has monopolized your coping repertoire, which is a reason to expand that repertoire, not a reason to keep the monopoly.

Sources and further reading

  1. Lazarus and Folkman — Stress, Appraisal, and Coping

    Springer, 1984. Foundational text distinguishing problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies.

  2. Aldao, Nolen-Hoeksema and Schweizer — Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review

    Clinical Psychology Review, 2010;30(2):217–237. Meta-analysis of how different emotion-regulation strategies relate to psychopathology. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004.

  3. Carver, Scheier and Weintraub — Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989;56(2):267–283. Development of the COPE inventory for measuring coping strategies. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267.

  4. Cooper, Frone, Russell and Mudar — Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: a motivational model of alcohol use

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995;69(5):990–1005. Model of how people use alcohol to manage both positive and negative emotional states. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.990.

  5. Gross — Emotion regulation: current status and future prospects

    Psychological Inquiry, 2015;26(1):1–26. Review of the emotion regulation field. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781.

  6. Khantzian — The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders: focus on heroin and cocaine dependence

    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1985;142(11):1259–1264. The self-medication hypothesis, proposing that substance use is an attempt to manage painful emotional states. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.142.11.1259.

Sources checked October 16, 2026. This is an editorial summary, not a systematic review or individual advice.

Related articles