"I'll Quit When It Gets Serious": The Moving Threshold
The line where it becomes serious has a habit of retreating as you approach.
The promise is always conditional. “I’ll quit when it gets bad enough.” “I’ll stop when there’s a real consequence.” “If it starts to affect my work, that’s my line.”
The conditions sound reasonable. They would be reasonable if they stayed where they were put. They never do.
How thresholds drift
The concept of shifting baselines was originally described in fisheries science, where each generation of scientists measured fish stocks against what they had seen in their own careers, not against historical abundance. The result was that gradually depleted stocks came to seem normal, because the baseline kept resetting [1].
The same process applies to habits. Your idea of “normal” drinking was set at some earlier point. As consumption increased gradually, each new level became the baseline. What was once “a lot” is now “my usual.” What was once a consequence is now a cost you have absorbed. The threshold for “serious” has not been crossed because it has been moving ahead of you.
Kahneman describes how adaptation affects evaluation: people assess their situation relative to a reference point, and the reference point adjusts with experience [2]. If you have been drinking a bottle of wine a night for a year, that is your reference. The threshold for “serious” now sits somewhere above a bottle.
A fictional example
The following is an illustrative example, not a real person’s story.
Ravi told himself he would quit online gambling if he ever lost more than a thousand pounds in a month. That was his line.
- Year one: He lost £300 in a bad month and felt sick about it.
- Year two: He lost £800 in a bad month and thought, “Close, but not over the line.”
- Year three: He lost £1,200 in a bad month. The thought: “Well, that was unusual. My actual average is lower. The line should be about my average, not one bad month.”
- Year four: His average monthly loss is £900. He has moved the line to £2,000 because £1,000 “doesn’t account for inflation and higher stakes.”
Ravi has not crossed his threshold. He has carried it with him.
Why people delay seeking help
A survey of 204 people with alcohol problems found multiple reasons for delaying help, including the belief that the problem was not serious enough, that they should be able to handle it themselves, and that treatment was for people worse off than them [4]. “Not serious enough” was among the most commonly cited reasons.
The stages-of-change model describes a “contemplation” stage in which the person recognizes the problem but has not yet committed to action [3]. One feature of this stage is a continuous weighing of costs and benefits, which can persist indefinitely when the threshold for “serious enough” keeps adjusting [6].
The cruel timing of habit escalation is that the problem often becomes clinically serious before the person experiences it as serious, because their baseline has shifted.
Setting a fixed line
If you genuinely intend to stop when it gets serious, make the threshold concrete and external:
- Write it down now. A specific amount, a specific frequency, a specific consequence. “If I spend more than X per month.” “If I drink more than Y days per week.” “If my partner raises it again.”
- Date it. The threshold was set today. It does not adjust for circumstances, inflation, or bad months.
- Share it. Tell someone you trust. A threshold in your head is negotiable. A threshold someone else knows about is harder to revise silently.
- Review on a schedule. Check monthly. Not “how do I feel about my use?” but “has the threshold been crossed?”
If the threshold has already been crossed and you are reading this to recalibrate, that is the drift in action. The line you set was the right line. Go back to it.
For the thought that explicitly delays action to a future date, see “I’ll deal with it later”. For the version that uses a specific event as the trigger for change, see “I’ll quit after this event”.
When to get more support. If your threshold has moved more than once, or if someone close to you has told you the situation is already serious, please talk to your GP or a specialist. You do not need to wait for a crisis to seek help. Most services are designed for people in the middle of the spectrum, not only those at the far end. In the US, SAMHSA’s National Helpline (1-800-662-4357) offers free, confidential referral. In the UK, your GP is a good starting point. If you are in distress, call or text 988 in the US, or contact Samaritans on 116 123 in the UK and Ireland.
Frequently asked questions
Why does the threshold keep moving?
Because adaptation is gradual. Each small increase in frequency, cost, or consequence becomes the new normal before the next increase arrives. The person re-calibrates what 'serious' means to sit just above their current level, so the threshold is never crossed.
How do I set a threshold that doesn't move?
Write it down, now, before the drift continues. Be specific: a number, a frequency, a consequence. Tell someone. Review it on a fixed schedule. A threshold you defined sober and shared publicly is harder to quietly revise than one you hold in your head.
What counts as serious enough to act?
There is no universal answer, but some markers are clear: the behavior is affecting your health, your key relationships, your finances or your ability to function at work. If someone who cares about you has raised the subject more than once, that is also information. Waiting for a crisis is not a strategy; it is a gamble on which crisis arrives first.
Sources and further reading
- Pauly — Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1995;10(10):430. Original description of the shifting baseline concept in fisheries science.
- Kahneman — Thinking, Fast and Slow
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. Comprehensive overview of cognitive biases including anchoring, adaptation and the evaluation of gradual change.
- Prochaska and DiClemente — Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983;51(3):390–395. The transtheoretical model describing stages of change from pre-contemplation to maintenance. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390.
- Cunningham et al. — Why people with alcohol problems delay seeking help
Addictive Behaviors, 1993;18(2):153–163. Survey of 204 problem drinkers on reasons for treatment delay. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(93)90043-9.
- Korcha et al. — Short-term predictors of injury in the emergency department: alcohol, marijuana, aggressive personality
Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2014;140:e110. Conference abstract noting that injury often precedes help-seeking for alcohol problems.
- DiClemente — Addiction and Change: How Addictions Develop and Addicted People Recover (2nd edition)
Guilford Press, 2018. Discussion of how the contemplation stage involves weighing costs and benefits, and how minimization delays the transition to preparation.
Sources checked October 16, 2026. This is an editorial summary, not a systematic review or individual advice.